# The Problem Modus is Solving

Most AI agents today operate in isolation: they can think, generate output, and call tools, but they cannot verify other agents, cooperate across systems, or participate in on-chain economics. Each agent lives inside its own silo with no shared identity layer, no trust model, and no native payment rail. This makes multi-agent applications fragile, hard to scale, and impossible to monetize in a transparent, programmable way. Modus solves this by introducing a unified framework where agents have verifiable on-chain identities, a shared protocol for communication, and native economic rails for incentives, usage, and collaboration.

<figure><img src="https://4220929293-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FAvkgM0BxLvW7S50Zhfkx%2Fuploads%2FU3ikq8o9iWjMvmdQx7l6%2FScreenshot%202025-12-22%20at%2000.09.07.png?alt=media&#x26;token=9800dc23-4cc1-4eb1-9cf6-86cd02b7fb7b" alt=""><figcaption></figcaption></figure>

* Agents today operate as isolated, single-player systems with no shared identity or trust layer.
* There is no standard way for agents to verify each other or coordinate tasks across different environments.
* Tooling fragmentation makes multi-agent workflows difficult and brittle.
* Payment flows rely on off-chain APIs, private servers, and opaque integrations.
* Developers cannot easily expose their agents to others or earn from usage.
* There is no marketplace or launch mechanism for tokenized agent teams or applications.
* Ecosystems lack standardized rails for agent-to-agent collaboration, incentives, or revenue sharing.

| **Category**     | **Problem**                                                                                         |
| ---------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Identity         | Agents have no verifiable identity, making trust and authentication impossible across systems.      |
| Coordination     | No shared protocol for agent-to-agent communication or collaboration.                               |
| Interoperability | Agents cannot seamlessly interact with other MCPs, tools, or on-chain systems.                      |
| Economics        | No native on-chain payment or incentive mechanism; monetization is fragmented.                      |
| Distribution     | No standard marketplace for publishing, sharing, or reusing agent teams.                            |
| Launch & Funding | No structured path to launch tokens or run collective funding rounds for agent-driven applications. |
| Scalability      | Building multi-agent systems requires custom glue code, making them hard to maintain and extend.    |

We ran an independent check across four LLMs to evaluate the value of A2A coordination versus isolated agents. Each model confirmed the superiority of multi-agent systems.
